Page 1 of 6
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 593
Interrelationship of social stratification and social cooperation in western
philosophy
Sharipov Abduhakimjon
Bukhara State University , Associate professor of the Philosophy Department of
“Islamic history and source Studies”, Candidate of philosophical Sciences
Anotation:
Society in terms of its structural structure includes closely interrelated sides,
frontiers, relatively large-subsystems within a single whole social system, social
groups and the social relations that occur between them.
Key words: society, social structure, social stratification, specifications
In the IV century BC, the ancient Greek philosopher Plato divided the members
of society into 3 groups: philosophers (upper class, as rulers of the state), the
military, and the lower class - slaves.
In western sociology, the social structure of society is studied on the basis of the
concept of social stratification.
Stratification means (Latin stratum – layer, and fatsio - do). One of the basic
concepts of Western sociology and its special field is that the social structure of
society is divided into social strata, groups, representing social inequality in
society.
There is inequality in all types of social society. Even in primitive societies,
where there was almost no economic differentiation between humans, there was an
inequality between men and women, young people and the elderly. While
describing social inequality, sociologists describe social stratification, sociologists
talk about social stratification. Stratification can be described as structural
differences between groups on the theories of stratification in modern societies
Weber, Eric Olin Wright, Frank Parkhins were widely engaged.Let's dwell on the
theory of Weber..It is difficult to call Weber (1867-1920) simply a "sociologist",
because his interests and ideas cover many disciplines.
Page 2 of 6
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 594
According to the Weber theory, many factors influence the formation of classes,
groups, strata in society. Weber believes that the division into classes is determined
not only by whether or not they have the means of production, but also by
economic differences that are not directly related to property. In the first place to
these factors is the skill and qualification that determines whether a person is able
to do something or not. Persons who fall into the category of professionals and
managers, as well as career degrees, titles, diplomas, give them a great advantage
before those who do not have such diplomas in the labor market.
Weber divides two more important specifications of stratification. To one it is
called the status (position), and on the other – the party. (in German, both concepts
are expressed using one word stand).
The concept of status in the Weber view is related to the fact that different social
groups have a different level of reputation in society. Properties that distinguish a
particular location from others can be elongated, not dependent on the class
division. Social prestige can be both positive and negative.
The position groups with positive preferences include people with a reputation
within this social system. For example, in the British society, doctors have a great
reputation. Negative preference status groups include parist groups. Pari-groups-a
group of people who are viewed with other members of society look down on them
"from top to bottom". For a long time in the history of Europe, Jews were fairies»
Jews were forbidden to engage in certain types of activities, including the
possession of State deeds. Possession of wealth, as a rule, depends on the
reputation, but in this there are many exceptions. For example, the existence of"
noble poor " can be an example of this. Belonging to the class depends on the
object of the pupil, the position, or rather on the subjective assessment.
Weber's views on stratification show that in human life, in addition to
affiliation, there are other types of stratification and great influence. As we study
stratification, we need to take into account not only the difference in economic and
professional circumstances, but also what happens with those who take these
situations into account. The term social mobility means a change in the socio- economic status of a particular person or group.
Page 3 of 6
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 595
What are the possibilities of social mobility? Those who have power and wealth
have the opportunity to keep them in their own hands and leave them to their
offspring. They give their children a good education that will open the way to a
good job. The rich, despite the property and inheritance taxes, find their property.
Many of those who have reached the highest depths have already received benefits
at the beginning: either from wealthy families, or from a correspondent of qualified
specialists.
In the history of mankind, strata (stratum) have also been evaluated as signs of
cultural improvement of the people. In particular, carpets, fireplaces, blacksmiths,
gardeners, gardeners and other professional strata not only carried out a specific
economic and social life walk through the labor activity, but also worried about the
fact that his people did not become the property of other people.
The theory of social stratification initially E.Dyurkgeym, G.Spencer,
F.Giddings, P.Formed and developed as a result of the scientific activity of
sorokines. E.In his work "the division of social Labor" (1893) he writes: "from
self, on the basis of natural power, men are distinguished by dignity. Otherwise
you can not. Thus, harmony is found in the context of the dignity of each
individual and their state P.Sorokin also expressed similar views on social
stratification in his work" the system of Sociology".
Currently B.Barber, D.Bell, V.Vil'chek, R.Darendorf, G.Mireal, A.Toffler,
A.Turen, L.Major American and Western European sociologists, such as Werner,
have contributed to the development of the theory of social stratification.
Manifestations of the theory of social stratification now deny that in Western
countries society is divided into antoganistic classes, consisting of bourgeoisie and
proletariat. Instead, they promote the concept that society is divided into "upper",
"lower" and "lower" classes and social strata. For example, the West German
sociologist R.Darendorf distinguishes society from the category of stewards and
stewards. In turn, the category of managers consists of two groups: property
managers and non – property managers-administrative bureaucrats managers, they
consider. The category of managers also consists of two groups: the upper –
"worker aristocracy", and the lower – the lower-qualification workers. These two
social classes are divided into the existing "new middle class", which indicates the
idea that it is formed from the confluence of governors and working aristocracy.
