Page 1 of 5
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 786
Effect Of Addition Of Calcium Nitrateon Selected Properties Of Concrete Containing
GGBFS
T. MOORTHI
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
PRIST (Deemed to be University), THANJAVUR.
ABSTRACT
This research examined the properties of concrete containing grade 120 slag cement at
replacement levels of 0%, 30%, and 50% and calcium nitrate added into the concrete mixes
atsome percentages. The primary concrete properties studied were compressive strength,
splittensilestrength. Material variations included four sources of ordinary Portland cement
andtwo types of coarse aggregate. Strength properties were studied at room temperature and
40°Fmix and curing conditions.
INTRODUCTION
Slag cement is a cementitious replacement
material that has been used in United States
concrete design since the early 1900s (Slag
Cement Association, 2002). Slag cement is a
byproduct of the iron-making process and is
composed primarily of silica and calcium. In
fine particle form, slag cement displays
cementetious qualities similar to those of
ordinaryportland cement (OPC). Slag
cement can therefore be substituted for OPC
in a wide range ofequal mass replacement
ratios. Because the root blast-furnace slag
material would otherwisebe discarded after
separation from molten iron, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agencyhas
designated slag cement as a ―recovered
material.
Agencies are required by
ExecutiveOrder 13101 to use high levels of
recovered materials whenever possible
(United StatesEnvironmental Protection...,
1998). Therefore, there is incentive to use
slag cement in thestate of Wisconsin.
Because the stoichiometry of 6ortland
cement hydration varies withdifferent
additives and field conditions, replacement
of 6ortland cement with slag cementcannot
be presumed to yield equivalent concrete.
Page 2 of 5
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 787
This research was directed at examining the
performance slag cement with
materialscommonly used in Wisconsin
paving projects. This project was a
continuation of an in-depth study of slag
cement concrete for highway pavement
applications in the state of Wisconsin. A
previous phase examined the performance
grade 100 slag cement concrete. The
objective of the current research project was
to quantify the strength development.
MATERIALS:
Materials were selected based on their
pertinence to Wisconsin concrete paving
operations.All materials were used as
provided by the manufacturer except for the
coarse and fineaggregates. Aggregates were
oven-dried for a minimum of 24 hours and
allowed to cool toambient temperature
before use. This additional step was taken to
gain maximum controlover the aggregate
water content. During mix design, the
amount of water needed to achievea w/cm
ratio of 0.45 was adjusted by the amount of
water absorbed by theaggregates. Due tothe
comparative nature of the project, the
perceived minor impact of these variations
on theobjectives of the research, and project
scheduling and time constraints, the coarse
aggregatewas not re-ordered from the
supplier.
Mix Design and Specimen Preparation
All mix proportions were based on
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Grade A andGrade A-S mix designs (2005).
The proportions for each mix design. All
concrete mixes wereprepared with a w/cm
ratio of 0.45 and a plastic air content of 6%
± 0.5%. The concretemixing was conducted
by two researchers using a 6-ft3 drum mixer
using the procedure specified in ASTM
C192.
A vinsol resin air-entraining agent from one
manufacturer and one shipment was used for
allmixing. Plastic air content was measured
according to ASTM C231. The coarse
aggregate aircorrection factors were 0.7%
and 0.6% for limestone and igneous
aggregates, respectively.When the
prescribed air content was not achieved, the
mix was discarded and performedagain on a
different date. All specimens were
consolidated using a heavy-duty vibration
table.
Page 3 of 5
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 788
METHODOLOGY
The methodology involves step by step
process of conducting the project. The first
step is tomake material collection i.e.,
cement, coarse aggregates, fine aggregates.
Then determiningthe properties of the
materials like specific gravity, water
absorption, fineness. Then design ofmix
proportion based on M4o using the code IS- 10262:2009. The test performed
arecompression test, split tensile test,
flexural test. The fiber percentages are
added to concreteare 0.0%, 0.25%, 0.5%,
1.0%, 1.5%, both the fibers i.e.,GGBS and
nitrates are added in equalproportion for
each trail.
DISCUSSION ON RESULTS
The compressive strength of concrete for 28
days, 90 days for 0%, 30%, 40% and 50%
replacement of GGBS and the values are
presented. Ground Granulated Blast Furnace
Slag(GGBS): GGBS is obtained by
quenching molten iron slag (a by-product of
iron and steelmaking) from a blast furnace
in water or steam, to produce a glassy,
granular product that isthen dried and
ground into a fine powder. GGBS is used to
make durable concrete structuresin
combination with ordinary port land cement
and/or other pozzolanic materials. GGBS
hasbeen widely used in Europe, and
increasingly in the United States and in Asia
(particularly inJapan and Singapore) for its
superiority in concrete durability, extending
the lifespan ofbuildings from fifty years to a
hundred years. Use of GGBS significantly
reduces the risk ofdamages caused by alkali- silica reaction, higher resistance to chloride,
and provides higherresistance to attacks by
sulfate and other chemicals. GGBS is
procured from vizag steel plant (VSP). The
fineness modulus of GGBS using blaine‘s
fineness is 320 m2 /kg and other properties
of GGBS.
The increase in cube compressive strength
of plain concrete from 28 to 180 days is
observed 16 percent whereas the increase in
cube compressive strength of 20, 40 and 60
percent cement replacement with GGBFS is
observed 32, 50 and 32 percent respectively
for Mix-I. Similarly, for Mix-II the increase
in compressive strength of plain concrete is
observed as 20 percent and compressive
strength of 20, 40 and 60 percent
replacement is 26, 39 and 33 percent
