Page 1 of 7
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 795
Experimental Study On Flexural Strength Of Wire Mesh Concrete
I. BHARATHIKANNAN
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
PRIST (Deemed to be University), THANJAVUR
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an experimental investigation performed on ferro-cement slabs, where
plaincement mortar of 1:3 mix ratio reinforced with two types of reinforcing wire meshes was
studied.Steel meshes with wire woven hexagonal openings and galvanized iron mesh were
comparedwith their performance against impact and fire exposure. The aim of this study is to
observe the influence of using ferrocement in enhancement of the mechanical properties of
reinforcedconcrete slabs subjected to impact and fire exposure. The paper provides evaluation
ofperformance by using the new technique ferro-cement, as a strengthening material of
reinforcedconcrete slabs compared with the existing reinforced concrete slabs of heavy self- weight andbrittle characteristics.
INTRODUCTION
In general there is a great development in
construction techniques employed all over
the world.The application of ferro-cement
in construction is a technique introduced to
replace heavy,brittle, crack prone
reinforced concrete members in an
effective manner. It is well known
thatconventional reinforced concrete
members are too heavy, brittle, cannot be
satisfactorily repairedif damaged, develop
cracks and reinforcements are liable to be
corroded.
The well distributed and aligned
reinforcement has made the ferrocement to
behave like steelplates. The tensile
strength of ferrocement elements is a result
of the volume of reinforcementused in the
structure. Apart from the volume of
reinforcement, the direction of its use in
line withthe force direction and tensile
stress direction is also important. The
tensile performance of theferrocement
concrete or structure can be grouped into
three,
Pre cracking phase
Post cracking phase
Page 2 of 7
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 796
Post yielding phase
Ferrocement members when subjected to
upward tensile stress behaves something
like a linearelastic material until the first
crack appears. Beyond this, the member
will enter the multiplecracking and
eventually continuing to a point where the
mesh starts to experience yielding. Once
at this stage the number of crack will
continue to grow with the increase in the
tensile force orstress. The specific surface
area of ferrocement member or element
has been found to influencethe first crack
in tension, as well as the width of the
cracks. In case of ferrocement, the wire
meshused as reinforcement is usually of
0.5 to 1mm diameter wire at 5mm to
10mm spacing.
The experimental program of the present
investigation comprised casting and testing
of threecontrol reinforced concrete beams
of dimensions 300 × 150 × 2,000 mm and
30 beams of totaldimensions of 300 × 150
× 2,000 mm consisting of 25 mm thick U- shaped permanent reinforcedmortar forms
filled with core material. The type of the
reinforcing steel mesh in the mortarforms,
number of steel mesh layers, the type of
core material, and the type of shear
connectingmedia between the reinforced
mortar forms and the core material were
varied in the test program.
METHODOLOGY
The behavior of ferrocement element
under compression mainly depended on
mix designproperties. The maximum stress
at first crack for ferrocement matrix
increase in proportion to thespecific area
of the element.
The experimental program of the present
investigation comprised casting and testing
of threecontrol reinforced concrete beams
of dimensions 300 × 150 × 2,000 mm and
30 beams of totaldimensions of 300 × 150
× 2,000 mm consisting of 25 mm thick U- shaped permanent reinforcedmortar forms
filled with core material. The type of the
reinforcing steel mesh in the mortarforms,
number of steel mesh layers, the type of
core material, and the type of shear
connectingmedia between the reinforced
mortar forms and the core material were
varied in the test program.
The details of the test specimens are given
in Table 1 and the cross sections of the
differentspecimens. The following code
was used for the sample designation: the
first letter defines thetype of mesh (W for
welded wire mesh and E for expanded
steel mesh), the second letter definesthe
Page 3 of 7
European Journal of Business &
Social Sciences
Available at https://ejbss.org/
ISSN: 2235-767X
Volume 07 Issue 05
May 2019
Available online:https://ejbss.org/ P a g e | 797
number of reinforcing mesh layers (S for
single layer and D for double layers), the
third letterdefines the type of core material
and the shear connection media (C for
concrete with bondingagent, R for
recycled concrete with bonding agent, B
for concrete brick with bonding agent, and
S for concrete core with mechanical shear
connection).
The test beams were divided into eleven
groups and each group contained three
identical specimens. Group number 1 is
the control group in which the beams were
cast using ordinaryformwork. The beams
in this group were reinforced with 2
12
mm high tensile strength steel 16bars at
the tension side and 2
12 mm high tensile
strength steel bars at the compression side
aswell as shear reinforcement (stirrups) of
Ø8 mm at 200 mm spacing. The beams
incorporatingreinforced mortar forms were
grouped according to the mesh type,
number of steel mesh layers,type of core
material, and shear connection method.
For all the beams incorporating
precastreinforced mortar forms, the core of
the material was reinforced with two high
tensile strength steelbars of 12 mm
diameter in the tension side only. Neither
reinforcing bars at the compression sidenor
stirrups were used in these groups. Two
types of steel mesh were used to reinforce
the Ushapedformsnamely;
WeldedwiremeshandX8expanded steel
mesh.Singleordoublelayers of the steel
mesh were used as shown in following
Table. In the design of the test specimen it
was assured that the total percentage of
steel reinforcement (reinforcing bars and
steel mesh) did not exceed the maximum
percentage allowed by the design code.
This is an important issue thatshould be
observed by the designers at the practical
application stage. Shear connection
betweenthe reinforced mortar form and the
core for groups 5 and 10 was provided by
fixing bolts throughthe sides and bottom of
the forms while for the rest of the groups
bonding agent was applied on
the inner surface of the forms before
casting the core.
Concrete was used for the control beams
and as core for groups 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 10.
The concrete
mix consisted of crushed dolomite, sand,
and Portland cement with coarse to fine
aggregate ratioof 2 and sand to cement
ratio of 2. The water/cement ratio was 0.4.
Superplasticizer with ratio of1.5 % by
weight of cement was used to improve
workability of the mixture. The
