Page 1 of 17

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 03 Issue 13

December 2017

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 497

Awareness Level of Rural People with Special

Reference to Mahatma Gandhi National Rural

Employment Guarantee Act

Dr. Shilpi Srivastava*

*Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce Nehru Mahavidyalaya, Lalitpur, Jhansi, India

Abstract

The enactments of employment guarantee act and right to information act are indeed significant

achievements in the history of India. These acts provide a wide spectrum of basic rights to

people of India towards shaping their own polity and society. In the First section of paper

Researcher will discuss about the level of awareness and satisfaction among rural people

towards MNREGA. And finally after analyzing the present scenario of MNREGA and its overall

impact on rural development we will conclude the research paper with some suggestions and

recommendations.

Keywords: Employment Schemes, Beneficiaries, Benefits, Financial Assistance, Government

Initiatives

1.0 Introduction:

In country like India, where human

workforce is the major resource in

development of economy, mechanism to

systematically utilize this force at grass root

development has been overlooked for many

years since independence. The enactment of

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural

Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) in

2005 is indeed a significant development in

this regard. In other 1words it symbolizes

the achievement of a very long civil society

and people’s movement towards ensuring

right to food through ensuring right to work.

The Indian Parliament passed the National

Rural Employment Guarantee Act

(MNREGA) in August 2005, which

provides for a minimum of 100 days of

guaranteed employment to every rural

household. Central government is making

large public expenditure under MNREGA.

In the budget (2009-10), an allocation of Rs

39,100 crore had been made for MNREGA,

which is an increase of 144 percent over the

2008-09 budget (16,000 crore). Rural

development has come to means to improve

the living conditions of general emphasis

unprecedented be viewed as the rural poor

by increasing their productive capacity and

raising actual income levels, eliminating the

sources of exploitation to establish social

justice and sensitizing them to be self- reliant. This is one of the formidable tasks

we are confronted with in challenging the

abject poverty threatening peace and social

harmony in the present day world.

Government plays a vital role in building up

the most appropriate resources to sustain

such a process. Proper implementation of

schemes generates development process

which makes people aware of the problems

and their appropriate solutions on the basis

of objective analysis of the root causes of

social malice and equips them with skills

and technology to act intelligently. So,

emphasis has rightly been placed on broad- basing primary eradication of rural problems

leading to removal of problems like health,

Page 2 of 17

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 03 Issue 13

December 2017

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 498

education, agriculture and financial

assistance schemes. A livelihood is

sustainable which can cope with and recover

from stress and shocks, maintain or enhance

its capabilities and assets, and provide

sustainable livelihood opportunities for the

next generation (Chambers and Conway,

1992). Although the role of government in

the process of rural development is multi- faceted and complicated. The purpose of this

series of research is not to have a

comprehensive survey of strategies and

programmes on a regional basis. For the

present, the aim is to include those schemes

which are actively concerned, and are

planning consciously, to relate the role of

education, health, agriculture and financial

support as an important factor for social

welfare of Indian people. The policies and

programmes have been designed with the

aim of alleviation of rural poverty which has

been one of the primary objectives of

planned development in India. It was

realized that a sustainable strategy of

poverty alleviation has to be based on

increasing the productive employment

opportunities in the process of growth itself.

Elimination of poverty, ignorance, diseases

and inequality of opportunities and

providing a better and higher quality of life

were the basic premises upon which all the

plans and blue-prints of development were

built. Workfare programmes have been

important programme interventions in India

and elsewhere in developing countries since

long. These programmes typically provide

unskilled workers with short-term

employment on public works. They provide

income transfers to poor households during

periods when they suffer on account of

absence of opportunities of employment.

In areas with high unemployment rates and

under employment, transfer benefits from

workfare programmes can prevent poverty

from worsening, especially during lean

periods. Durable assets that these

programmes create have the potential to

generate second-round employment benefits

as requisite infrastructure is developed. We

have a long history and experience in

implementing wage employment

programmes. However, beginning with

Jawahar Rojagar Yojana in 1989, the

outreach of these programmes increased

significantly as in the period 1989 to 2006,

ultimately culminating in MNREGA. These

wage employment programmes

implemented by State Governments with

Central assistance were self-targeting, and

the objective was to provide enhanced

livelihood security, especially of those

dependent on casual manual labour. Based

on the experience of these programmes the

MNREGA was enacted to reinforce the

commitment towards livelihood security in

rural areas. The Act was notified on 7

September 2005. The significance of

MNREGA lies in the fact that it creates a

right based frame work for wage

employment programmes and makes the

government legally bound to provide

employment to those who seek it. In this

way the legislation goes beyond providing a

social safety net, and towards guaranteeing

the right to employment. The experience

with MNREGA so far suggests that it is one

of the main planks of rapid poverty

reduction in the Eleventh Five-Year Plan.

Starting with 200 districts across the country

in Phase-I during 2006–07, MNREGA was

extended to additional 130 districts in Phase- II during 2007–08. From 1 April 2008

onwards the Act will cover the whole of

rural India. As a district is notified under the

Act, Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana

(SGRY) is automatically merged in the

MNREGA and would therefore cease to

exist with effect from 1 April 2008. The

Page 3 of 17

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 03 Issue 13

December 2017

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 499

objective of the MNREGA is to enhance the

livelihood security of the people in rural

areas by guaranteeing 100 days of wage

employment in a financial year to a rural

household whose members volunteer to do

unskilled manual work. The Act further

aims at creating durable assets and

strengthening the livelihood resource base of

the rural poor. The choice of works

suggested in the Act address causes of

chronic poverty like drought, Deforestation,

soil erosion, etc., so that the process of

employment generation is on a sustainable

basis. Employment is dependent upon the

worker exercising the choice to apply for

registration, obtain a job card, and then to

seek employment through a written

application for the time and duration chosen

by her. The legal guarantee has to be

fulfilled within the time limit prescribed and

this mandate is underpinned by the provision

of unemployment allowance.

2.0 Review of Literature

Datar (2007) for why the MNREGA scheme

has failed to take off in Maharashtra. It

stated that there is no enthusiasm among the

political class as well as bureaucracy to

accept new scheme, which is more

decentralized and hence to be more

transparent and accountable to those who

need work. MNREGA has not picked up

momentum because government machinery

is paralyzed.

Colin and Parker(2005)confirmed that

existing knowledge of the activities of

regulators in developing countries does not

provide a clear picture. There is mixed

evidence regarding the extent to which

regulators address poverty issues and about

the results of regulatory decisions.

Fasoranti (2010) examined the influence of

micro credit on poverty alleviation among

rural areas. The government schemes had

positive influence on respondents’ major

macroeconomic variables namely income,

savings, consumption expenditures and asset

acquisition. Among other things, the level of

poverty was high as reflected in the type of

residence, cooking materials, health

institutions attended by respondents and

educational institutions attended by their

children. Generally 20.8, 30.9, 47.5 and

0.8% rated the programme good, poor, fair

and excellent respectively. The study

recommends a greater coverage of the state

by the scheme. Recipients should also be

encouraged to reinvest their profits in other

productive economic activities. pation and

social integration (Frankenberger, 1996).

One of the major goals of the Mahatma

Gandhi

National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

(MNREGA), a centrally sponsored flagship

programme for rural employment

generation, started form 2nd February, 2006

is to ensure livelihood security to the rural

people.

Objective of the Study:

 Analyzing the awareness level of

rural people towards Employment

Generation schemes of government

(MNREGA).

 Analyzing the satisfaction level of

rural people towards Employment

Generation schemes of government.

 Analyzing the factors of satisfaction

of rural people.

3.0 Research Methodology: As in this

paper we will explore the existing facts

present in the environment or universe. It

will consider different aspects of the

problem related to government schemes for

rural development. So we will take

Exploratory Research Design in our research

project. Collection of data will be done by

survey method.

 Research Design: Descriptive

Research design