Page 1 of 8
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at
http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/
e-ISSN: 2395-0463
Volume 02 Issue 12
December 2016
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 23
Perceptual evaluation of the multi-exposure quality of the
image Fusion
1
tummala Santosh Kumar,2 Mr.P.V.Vara Prasad Rao
1PG Scholar, Department of ECE, SLC's Institute of Engineering and Technology, Piglipur Village, Hayathnagar
Mandal, Near Ramoji Film City, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad, Telangana
2Assosciate Professor, Department of ECE, SLC's Institute of Engineering and Technology, Piglipur Village, Hayathnagar
Mandal, Near Ramoji Film City, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad, Telangana
Abstract— Multi-exposure image fusion
(MEF) is considered an effective quality
enhancement technique widely adopted in
consumer electronics, but little work has
been dedicated to the perceptual quality
assessment of multi-exposure fused images.
In this paper, we first build an MEF
database and carry out a subjective user
study to evaluate the quality of images
generated by different MEF algorithms.
There are several useful findings. First,
considerable agreement has been observed
among human subjects on the quality of
MEF images. Second, no single state-of-the- art MEF algorithm produces the best quality
for all test images. Third, the existing
objective quality models for general image
fusion are very limited in predicting
perceived quality of MEF images. Motivated
by the lack of appropriate objective models,
we propose a novel objective image quality
assessment (IQA) algorithm for MEF
images based on the principle of the
structural similarity approach and a novel
measure of patch structural consistency.
Our experimental results on the subjective
database show that the proposed model well
correlates with subjective judgments and
significantly outperforms the existing IQA
models for general image fusion. Finally, we
demonstrate the potential application of the
proposed model by automatically tuning the
parameters of MEF algorithms.
.I. INTRODUCTION
MULTI-EXPOSURE image fusion (MEF) is
considered an effective quality enhancement
technique that is widely adopted in
consumer electronics .MEF takes a sequence
of images with different exposure levels as
inputs and synthesizes an output image that
is more informative and perceptually
appealing than any of the input images.
MEF fills the gap between high dynamic
range (HDR) natural scenes and low
Page 2 of 8
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 24
dynamic range (LDR) pictures captured by
normal digital cameras. Comparing with
typical HDR imaging techniques which first
construct an HDR image from the source
sequence and then tone-map it to an LDR
image, MEF bypasses the intermediate HDR
image construction step and directly yields
an LDR image that can be displayed on
standard viewing devices.
Since first introduced in 1980’s MEF has
been an active research topic and attracted
an increasing amount of attention in recent
years . With many MEF algorithms at hand,
it becomes pivotal to compare their
performance, so as to find the best algorithm
as well as directions for further
advancement. Because the human visual
system (HVS) is the ultimate receiver in
most applications, subjective evaluation is a
straightforward and reliable approach to
evaluate the quality of fused images
Although expensive and time consuming a
comprehensive subjective user study has
several benefits. First, it provides useful data
to study human behaviors in evaluating
perceived quality of fused images. Second, it
supplies a test set to evaluate and compare
the relative performance of classical and
state-of-the-art MEF algorithms. Third, it is
useful to validate and compare the
performance of existing objective image
quality assessment (IQA) models in
predicting the perceptual quality of fused
images. This will in turn provide insights on
potential ways to improve them. Over the
past decade, substantial effort has been
made to develop objective IQA models for
image fusion applications Most of them are
designed for generalpurpose image fusion
applications, not specifically for MEF, and
some of them can only work with the case of
two input images. Furthermore, little has
been done to compare them
with (or calibrate against) subjective data
that contains a wide variety of source
sequences and MEF algorithms. In this
work, we aim to tackle the problem of
perceptual quality assessment of MEF
images. We build one of the first databases
dedicated to subjective evaluation of MEF
images. The database contains 17 source
sequences with multiple exposure levels (≥
3) and the fused images generated by 8
classical and state-of-the-art MEF
algorithms. Based on the database, we carry
out a subjective user study to evaluate and
compare the quality of the fused images. We
observe considerable agreement between
human subjects, and not a single MEF
algorithm produces the best quality for all
test images. More importantly, we find that
existing objective quality models for general
There was a problem loading this page. Retrying...
Page 3 of 8
Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 25
image fusion are very limited in predicting
perceived quality of MEF images. This
motivates us to develop a novel objective
IQA model for MEF images. Our model is
inspired by the structural similarity (SSIM)
index whose philosophy is that the HVS is
highly adapted for extracting structural
information from natural scenes. To
compare the structures of multiple patches
from different exposures, we introduce a
novel measure of patch structural
consistency. Furthermore, to balance
between finer-scale detail preservation and
coarserscale luminance we adopt a multi- scale approach where with the scale shifting
from fine to coarse, SSIM-based structural
comparison captures image distortions from
fine details to large-scale luminance
variations. Experimental results show that
the proposed model well correlates with
subjective judgments and significantly
outperforms existing objective IQA models
for general image fusion. The value of
objective models are beyond measuring and
comparing MEF images and algorithms.
II. RELATED WORK
The problem of MEF can be generally
formulated as Y(i ) = K _ k=1 Wk (i )Xk(i ),
(1) where K is the number of multi-exposure
input images in the source sequence, Xk (i )
and Wk (i ) represent the luminance value
(or the coefficient amplitude in the
transform domain) and the weight at the i -th
pixel in the k-th exposure image,
respectively. Y denotes the fused image. The
weight factor Wk (i ) is often spatially
adaptive and bears information regarding the
relative structural detail and perceptual
importance at different exposure levels.
Depending on the specific models for
structural information and perceptual
importance, MEF algorithms differ in the
computation of Wk . A significant number
of MEF algorithms have been proposed,
ranging from simple weighted averaging to
sophisticated methods based on advanced
statistical image models. Local and global
energy weighting approaches are the
simplest ones, which employ the local or
global energy in the image to determine Wk
. Dated back to 1984, Burt first employed
Laplacian pyramid decomposition for
binocularimage fusion. Later in 1994, Burt
and Kolczynski applied thisdecomposition
to MEF, where they selected the local
energy of pyramid coefficients and the
correlation between pyramids within the
neighborhood to compute Wk . Laplacian
pyramid turns out to be an effective scheme
in image fusion to avoid unnatural
appearance and unwanted artifacts
There was a problem loading this page. Retrying...
