Page 1 of 16

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 01 Issue 11

December 2015

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 582

Budgeting System in Ethiopia: Program Budget System

“Two Birds with One Stone” Ethiopian Proverb

Tefera Asefa Moreda (MPMP)

Lecturer and Department Head, Public Administration and Development Management, collage of

Business and Economics, Dilla University SNNPR

Email: teferaasefa@gmail.com

Abstract

Program budget system is one of the

results of the budget reform which is the

part of public sector financial management

reform initiatives. Different budgetary

reform were undertaken in developed as

well as developing counties, but most

extensively in OECD countries. In the case

of Ethiopia, program budgeting system was

introduced recently under the expenditure

management and control program (EMCP)

which is one of the sub-programs of the

public sector reform. This budgeting

system was not as such applied and

implemented in government institutions

and levels. In Ethiopia, successful

implementation of program budget system

has been faced different challenges.

Ethiopian government started the program

budget without considering necessary

condition for the successful implementation

of the program. Important institution and

institutional framework are under

developed in Ethiopia. Despite some

progress in introducing program budget at

federal level, Ethiopia faced different

challenges in successful implementation of

the reform program. Lack of sufficient

training to the public personnel, absence of

basic infrastructures (IFMIS, accrual

accounting system and new institutional

set-up) which support the reform program

are not yet developed and improved in

Ethiopia

Page 2 of 16

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 01 Issue 11

December 2015

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 583

1. Introduction

Background of the paper

Whenever we are talking and writing about

program budgeting system, it is mandatory

to touch the historical backgrounds of the

term in American perspectives. This is

because the term is the results of budgetary

reform in America in the 20th century and it

was originated there. Program budget

system is one of the results of the budget

reform which is the part of public financial

management reform initiatives. Different

budgetary reform were undertaken in

developed as well as developing counties,

but most extensively in OECD countries.

These budgetary reforms include line item

budget, performance budget, program

budget and zero based budgets which are

the most commonly known (Huge, 2003;

the world bank, 1998). From these the

paper concentrates on program budget

system in Ethiopian budgetary system.

In reality Program budget has passed

different distinctive evolutionary period

starting from 1907, but it was first initiated

and attempted for the entire agencies by

president Lynda Johnson in 1960s, in USA

along side with the introduction of program

budget by secretary of defense McNamara

and his comptroller Hitch in defense force

(Huge, 2003; Hagen, 1968, the world

Bank, 1998; Novick, 1966).

It is very difficult to define the term

program budgeting system in precise and

single word. There are different meanings

and connotation of the term in different

parts of the world. Exactly how program

budgeting terms are used varies

enormously in practice. It is a confusing

term that uses different name in different

countries especially in developing

countries. (The World Bank, 2007)

Obviously, if there are multiple ways of

defining a program budget, no particular

approach has a special claim to legitimacy

(KIPF and WB, 2007). But there is

consensus among the scholars. This is a

key to program budgeting is the program -

a public policy objective along with the

steps necessary to attain it (The world

Bank, 1998). Added to this, World Bank

stipulated that the budget is classified in

terms of programs, rather than along

organizational lines. Program budgeting

requires that program objectives stretch

beyond a single fiscal year. In addition,

program budgeting requires effectiveness

measures, which means the measurement

of outputs and outcomes. The advocates of

program budgeting hoped that budget

Page 3 of 16

Journal for Studies in Management and Planning

Available at http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/

e-ISSN: 2395-0463

Volume 01 Issue 11

December 2015

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/JSMaP/ P a g e | 584

allocation decisions would be made

according to the marginal value that could

be attained from varying use of public

resources. (ibid)

Program budgeting aimed at direct funding

more towards the achievement of actual

policy objectives or outputs. Under

program budgeting, government activities

are divided into the hierarchical structure

of program, subprogram, activity and

component (if necessary). Appropriations

can then be made to particular program

according to the priorities of the

government of the day. Instead of funding

inputs to the administrative process as in

the traditional budget (salaries, overtime,

postage and so on), identifiable program

are funded. Management reporting systems

can then be based on the program structure

to encourage better feedback on program

performance, and allow, in principle, for

evaluating the effectiveness of managers

and staff. This, or the extension of program

budgeting to funding outcomes, depends

on the establishment of suitable

performance indicators. The proper

development of objectives, Program

structures and performance indicators are a

difficult and time-consuming task for all

levels in an organization, but is a logical

extension of the change from

administration to management in

government. (Huge, 2003; World Bank,

1998; World Bank, 2007)

Even if it is a principal budgetary reform

which was imported to many developing

countries, program budgeting system had

never be practically successful in ether

developed or developing countries. Many

critics have been raised from different

angles. For instance, as quoted in Huge,

2003 (Wildavsky, 1979) provided a very

prominent criticism of the programbudget.

In the case of Ethiopia, program budgeting

system was introduced recent time under

the expenditure management and control

program (EMCP) which is one of the sub- program of the civil service

reform(MoFED, 2011) and even it was not

as such applied and implemented in many

government institutions and levels. At the

first time, some selected government

institutions at the federal level are being

implementing program budgeting system

as a pilot base. The Ministry of Finance

and Economic Development (MOFED),

has made some progress in the

implementation of the Programme-Based

Budget (PBB), which is an essential part of